Filip Gustafsson vs Jonathan Mridha Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Gustafsson's second serve performance over the last 6 months shows a win rate of 40.53%, while Mridha performs better at 47.8%. Could this indicate a potential edge for Mridha?
• In return games, Mridha again outperforms Gustafsson, winning 50.18% of opponents' second serve points, compared to Gustafsson's 43.28%.
• On first serve returns, both players are closely matched: Gustafsson at 29.3% and Mridha at 29.12%.
• Under pressure, Mridha has shown greater resilience, saving 57.8% of breakpoints, while Gustafsson saves 43.14%.
• Looking at match success over the past year, Gustafsson shows a higher win rate, securing 70.59% of matches compared to Mridha's 50%.
• Gustafsson's best surface is Clay with a 60% win rate, closely aligned with Mridha’s best on Hard Court also at 60%.
• In terms of the quality of opponents, Gustafsson has faced players with an average ranking of 305.29, slightly higher in quality than Mridha’s opponents, ranked on average at 329.17.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Gustafsson excels, winning 67% of such scenarios versus Mridha's 40%.
• Mridha demonstrates stronger breakpoint conversion in recent matches, converting 60.47% of opportunities against Gustafsson's 42.86%.

Editorial Prediction (August 20, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming tennis match between Gustafsson and Mridha presents an intriguing clash of strengths and styles. Mridha holds a slight edge in second serve performance as well as return games, indicating potential dominance in critical game situations. With a higher percentage of breakpoints saved and converted, Mridha might capitalize more effectively under pressure.

Gustafsson, however, has demonstrated consistent match-winning capabilities over the past year, outperforming Mridha in overall match win percentage. When considering the quality of opponents faced, Gustafsson's competition has been slightly tougher, reaffirming the significance of his win ratio.

Experience in deciding sets also tips in Gustafsson's favor, suggesting that if the match becomes tightly contested, Gustafsson's composure could be decisive.

Despite these observations, the performance on serve and returns often dictates the flow of matches. With slight advantages in these areas, Mridha stands as a strong competitor. Yet, factoring in overall stability and deciding set advantage, Gustafsson emerges as a slight favorite to claim victory in this encounter.